Training & Development
Designed for Impact. Governed by Training Transfer Effectiveness.
Training Is Not the Starting Point
Training is often treated as a solution before the real problem is understood.
At M.Bryan Consulting, training is one lever within a broader system designed to deliver Impact, ROE, and ROI.
Every training engagement is governed by the Training Transfer Effectiveness Operating System (TTE–OS) to ensure training translates into performance improvement and sustained results.
How Our Training Works
How We Design Training for Impact
Our training engagements follow a disciplined lifecycle:
The Training Transfer Effectiveness Operating System (TTE–OS)
How Training Is Designed to Deliver Measurable Impact
Most organisations do not struggle with delivering training.
They struggle with getting results from training.
The TTE–OS is M.Bryan Consulting’s integrated system for ensuring that training investments translate into measurable Impact, clear Return on Expectations (ROE), and defensible Return on Investment (ROI).
The TTE–OS governs how training decisions are made, how application is designed, and how outcomes are sustained.
Why TTE–OS Exists
Training often fails to deliver results because:
- training is approved before the real problem is validated,
- application is assumed rather than deliberately designed,
- success is defined after the fact,
- outcomes fade once training ends.
TTE–OS exists to eliminate training waste by addressing these issues systemically, not episodically.
What Makes TTE–OS Different
TTE–OS is not a framework for delivery alone.
It is an operating system that governs training across its three phases.
Under TTE–OS:
- training is not the default solution,
- impact is not accidental,
- expectations are defined upfront,
- sustainability is designed, not hoped for.
The three pillars of the TTE–OS are: The NVP Model, the PDP Model, and the TTE Sustainability Framework.
Next Steps
Explore The Needs Validation Process (NVP) Model
Explore The PDP Model
Explore The Sustainability Framework (TTE–SF)
Making the Right Training Decision Before You Invest
Training is often approved as a solution before the real problem is clearly understood.
When this happens, organisations spend time, money, and credibility on interventions that were never designed to succeed.
The NVP exists to prevent this.
The NVP is a structured diagnostic process within the Training Transfer Effectiveness Operating System (TTE–OS) that validates whether a performance challenge requires training, non-training, or an integrated solution before any training is designed or delivered.
Why NVP Matters
Most training failures do not start in the classroom.
They start at the decision stage.
Common realities include:
- Training requested to fix symptoms rather than root causes
- HR and L&D pressured to deliver without clarity
- Expectations defined after training, not before
- Leaders questioning value once training ends
The NVP addresses these issues upfront, where the greatest leverage exists.
What The NVP Does
- clarifies the real performance problem,
- distinguishes between skill gaps and non-training issues,
- defines leadership expectations (ROE) clearly before training,
- prevents unnecessary or misaligned training investments.
Training does not proceed by assumption.
It proceeds by evidence.
What The NVP Is — and Is Not
The NVP is:
- A decision-making process
- Leadership-aligned
- Evidence-based
- Independent of training delivery
The NVP is not:
- A training needs assessment form
- A justification exercise for pre-approved training
- A generic diagnostic workshop
Who The NVP Is For
- expect training to deliver real performance results,
- want clarity before committing resources,
- are serious about Impact, ROE, and ROI.
CTA: What Are You Waiting For?
The NVP is Part of the Training Transfer Effectiveness Operating System.
Designing Training for Application, Impact, and Accountability
Strong training delivery does not guarantee performance change.
The PDP model is the implementation engine within the TTE–OS. It deliberately designs what happens before, during, and after training to ensure learning is applied on the job and leads to measurable impact.
The PDP is applied only after the NVP confirms that training is the right solution.
Why The PDP Is Necessary
Many organisations experience:
- high engagement during training,
- enthusiasm immediately after,
- and limited behaviour change weeks later.
This happens when application is assumed, not designed.
The PDP exists to ensure that training:
- is positioned correctly before delivery,
- is delivered with application in mind,
- and is supported after delivery until impact is visible.
What The PDP Does
The PDP ensures that:
- expectations are clear before training begins,
- learning is connected to real work during training,
- application is supported and reviewed after training,
- impact is visible and attributable.
Training is treated as a performance intervention, not an event.
What The PDP Is — and Is Not
The PDP is:
- a structured application model,
- selective and intentional,
- designed for high-impact training.
The PDP is not:
- a generic training checklist,
- a post-training follow-up exercise,
- applied to every training programme.
The PDP is used where impact must not fail.
Important Boundaries
- The PDP is implemented directly by M.Bryan Consulting or by authorised practitioners trained through the MasterMind Program and through the Certified TTE Practitioner certification.
- The PDP is not offered as a standalone, ungoverned handover model for untrained third-party trainers.
- The PDP is applied following decision clarity, typically informed by the NVP.
Independent application of the PDP requires demonstrated capability and alignment with the TTE–OS principles. These boundaries protect outcomes and accountability.
CTA: Ready to move from delivery to performance?
The PDP is Part of the Training Transfer Effectiveness Operating System.
Ensuring Training Impact Is Sustained and Becomes Business as Usual
Training impact should not disappear once a programme ends.
The Training Transfer Effectiveness Sustainability Framework (TTE–SF) is the sustainability layer within the Training Transfer Effectiveness Operating System (TTE–OS).
It supports organisations to reinforce, govern, and embed training outcomes so that impact is sustained over time and integrated into normal business operations.
The TTE–SF focuses on institutionalising impact, not creating dependence on external support.
Why The TTE–SF Is Necessary
Many organisations experience initial improvements after training, only to see results fade within weeks or months.
This happens when:
- ownership of outcomes is unclear after training ends,
- reinforcement relies on goodwill rather than structure,
- impact is not reviewed consistently,
- training remains an event rather than part of how work is done.
The TTE–SF exists to ensure that training outcomes endure.
What The TTE–SF Does
The TTE–SF helps organisations:
- determine which training outcomes must be sustained,
- clarify who owns outcomes after delivery ends,
- embed reinforcement into existing routines and processes,
- establish simple governance for ongoing review.
Sustainability is achieved through design and ownership, not additional bureaucracy.
What TTE–SF Is — and Is Not
The TTE–SF is:
- a sustainability design framework,
- leadership-owned,
- embedded into business operations.
The TTE–SF is not:
- a promise of automatic sustainability,
- a monitoring system,
- a replacement for leadership responsibility.
The TTE–SF designs the conditions for sustainability.
Organisations choose to uphold them.
When The TTE–SF Is Applied
- after The NVP and The PDP engagements, or
- when organisations want to embed training transfer discipline across multiple initiatives.
It can be applied selectively to high-impact or recurring training portfolios.
Who The TTE–SF Is For
- want training outcomes to last,
- value accountability beyond delivery,
- are ready to embed learning into how work is done.
CTA: Training impact should not fade once programmes end.
The TTE–SF is Part of the Training Transfer Effectiveness Operating System.